La communication non verbale

SINECORE – Réalisé à l’hiver 2017 avec la collaboration de Vincent Denault, LL.M., LL.B., CFE, avocat.

Références suggérées à propos de la communication non verbale : 

– Baker, A., Porter, S., Ten Brinke, L., & Mundy, C. (2016). Seeing is believing: observer perceptions of trait trustworthiness predict perceptions of honesty in high-stakes emotional appeals. Psychology, Crime & Law, 22(9), 817-831.

– Bandes, S. A. (2016). Remorse and criminal justice. Emotion Review, 8(1), 14-19.

– Blumenthal, J. A. (1993). A wipe of the hands, a lick of the lips: The validity of demeanor evidence in assessing witness credibility. Nebraska Law Review, 72(4), 1157-1204.

– Burgoon, J. K., Guerrero, L. K., et Floyd, K. (2010). Nonverbal communication. Boston: Pearson.

– Denault, V. (2015). Communication non verbale et crédibilité des témoins. Cowansville, Canada : Éditions Yvon Blais.

– Denault, V., Jupe, L., Dodier, O., & Rochat, N. (2017). To veil or not to veil, detecting lies in the courtroom: A comment on Leach et al. (2016). Psychiatry, psychology and law, 24(1), 102-117.

– Heath, W. P. (2009). Arresting and convicting the innocent: The potential role of an “inappropriate” emotional display in the accused. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 27, 313-332.

– Porter S., ten Brinke L. (2009). Dangerous decisions: A theoretical framework for understanding how judges assess credibility in the courtroom. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 14, 119-134

– Seniuk, G. T. G. (2013). Credibility assessment, common law trials and fuzzy logic. In B. S. Copper, G. Dorothee & M. Ternes (Eds.), Applied issues in in investigative interviewing, eyewitness memory, and credibility assessment (pp. 19-30). New York: Springer.

– ten Brinke, L., & Porter, S. (2013). Discovering deceit: Applying laboratory and field research in the search for truthful and deceptive behaviour. In B. Cooper, D. Griesel, & M. Ternes (Eds.), Applied issues in investigative interviewing, eyewitness memory, and credibility assessment (pp. 221-237). Springer: New York.

– Vrij, A. (2008). Detecting lies and deceit. Chichester: Wiley.

– Wilson, J. P., & Rule, N. O. (2015). Facial trustworthiness predicts extreme criminal-sentencing outcomes. Psychological Science, 26(8), 1325-1331.

– Wilson, J. P., & Rule, N. O. (2016). Hypothetical sentencing decisions are associated with actual capital punishment outcomes. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(4) 331-338.


Abécédaire – retour à l’index